Legal Opinion

Arcadia Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Elliott Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The only damages which are available for recoupment are those which accrue to a defendant from the contract or transaction out of which the plaintiff’s cause of action arises. 57 C. J. 396, 397. See also Johnson v. Association, 68 N. H. 437, 438, and cases cited. The present case differs essentially from that of Flanders v. Putney, 58 N. H. 358, which is cited in the defendant’s brief, for the defendant here alleges no single comprehensive agreement covering the sales and deliveries in question. On the contrary, the situation presented by the pleadings is that of a series of independent and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ewing-Merkel Electric Co. v. Lewisville Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The General Contracting & Trading Co., LLC v. Interpole, Inc. v. Transamerican Steamship Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Lovejoy v. AshworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  3. Zurback Steel Corp. v. EdgcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Mast Road Grain & Building Materials Co. v. Ray Piet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc. (In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API