Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Barnett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was an action for slander by the appellee against the appellant. The complaint was in five paragraphs. The second and third were stricken out on motion of the defendant. A joint demurrer to the first, fourth, and fifth, because they did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was filed by the defendant and overruled by the court. Exception was taken. The defendant filed an answer consisting of the general denial and two special paragraphs. A demurrer was filed to the second and third, sustained to the second, and overruled as to the third. There was a reply in denial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Byrket v. MonohonIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Lanter v. M'EwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. M'Glemery v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Gants v. VinardIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Offutt v. EarlywineIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Davis v. SladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Downey v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Buscher v. ScullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API