Buscher v. Scully
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee’s complaint contains two sets of slanderous words, and is unquestionably sufficient to repcd the demurrer addressed to the entire pleading, even though it should be conceded that one set was not actionable.
Eulings of the trial court in excluding evidence or in refusing to chock the misconduct of counsel in argument can not be brought into the record by the affidavit of one of the parties. The proper mode of getting such rulings into the record is by setting them forth in the bill of exceptions as the action of the court. Indianapolis, etc., G. R. Co. v. Christian, 93 Ind. 360.
Our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waugh v. WaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Seller v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Proctor v. OwensIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Branstetter v. DorroughIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Indianapolis & Cumberland Gravel Road Co. v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Roose v. RooseIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Binford v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford v. HuffstetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Peinhardt v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.