Legal Opinion

Farca v. Semah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a negligence action to recover for property damage, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated April 6, 1990, as denied their motion to dismiss the defendants’ answer or, in the alternative to direct the defendants to appear for a deposition, and as granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3130 as to the plaintiffs’ notice to take a deposition.

Ordered that the order is modified (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Niesig v. Team IAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Greene v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brignola v. Pei-Fei LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Gotlin v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Schnall v. Ecole Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API