Legal Opinion

Matter of Curtis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1995No. 80S00-9212-DI-962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint against Vance W. Curtis on December 10, 1992, alleging that Curtis violated Rule 1.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by privately representing a client while at the same time involved, as prosecuting attorney, in an investigation and resolution of alleged eriminal violations of that client. 1 "Ordinarily, a lawyer may not act as advocate against a client the lawyer represents in some other matter, even if the other matter is wholly unrelated." Comment to Prof.Cond.R. 1.7.

This Court appointed a…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Matter of DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Flatt-MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API