Matter of Curtis
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission filed a verified complaint against Vance W. Curtis on December 10, 1992, alleging that Curtis violated Rule 1.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law by privately representing a client while at the same time involved, as prosecuting attorney, in an investigation and resolution of alleged eriminal violations of that client. 1 "Ordinarily, a lawyer may not act as advocate against a client the lawyer represents in some other matter, even if the other matter is wholly unrelated." Comment to Prof.Cond.R. 1.7.
This Court appointed a…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- In Matter of DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Flatt-MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2011