Legal Opinion

In Re Flatt-Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2012No. 30S00-0911-DI-535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

2Per curiam

We find that Respondent, Nancy J. Flatb-Moore, engaged in attorney misconduct by surrendering her prosecutorial discretion in plea negotiations entirely to the pecuniary demands of the victim of the crime. For this misconduct, we find that Respondent should receive a public reprimand.

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action,” and on the post-hearing briefing by the parties. Respondent’s 1998 admission…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stites v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matter of MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of CurtisIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Leigh Anne G. Manlove, Wsb 6-3441Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Leigh Anne G. Manlove, Wsb 6-3441Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Bobby Dunn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Brian M.E. Skirvin v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Dunn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API