State ex rel. Beise v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Certiorari to the district court for Hennepin county and Honoráble Charles M. Pond, a judge thereof, to review an order of said court confirming the report of appraisers appointed to determine and award compensation for property damaged by the construction of a dam to raise the water of lake Minnetonka. By the report the property of relators was found not damaged and they were denied any compensation.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Certiorari to the district court of Hennepin county to return the record in condemnation proceedings under Laws 1897, c. 88.
The petitioners are owners of land adjacent to Six-Mile creek, an inlet of Lake Minnetonka, some twelve miles above the dam maintained at the outlet of the lake for the “improvement of navigation, preservation of health,” etc., under the statute referred to. An effort had been previously made under Sp. Laws 1891, c. 381, to establish a uniform height for the maintenance of the waters of that lake, but contained no provision for the assessment of damages to parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- People Ex Rel. S. U.H.R.R. Co. v. . BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Derosia v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- State ex rel. Hurd v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- McCrory v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Ephraim Creek C. & C. Co. v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Ryan v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. NolegsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- McGee v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.