State v. Nolegs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court„ Pawnee County; ■ L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the State of Oklahoma against Tarry Nolegs, W: H. Edmisten,'H. A. Thomas, J. E. Duffey, Producers’ Oil Company, and the Milliken Oil Company, and the Jim Crow Oil Company intervenes. From a judgment foi; certain ,defendT ants and against the State, the Jim Crow Oil Company, and Larry Nolegs, the parties last named bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.
The state of Oklahoma, plaintiff in error, was the plaintiff below, and commenced this action against the defendants in error, defendants below, to quiet title in and to the river bed of the Arkansas river in section 25, range 8, and in the west half of section.30, range 9, and an island described as lots 7 and 11 in said Arkansas river, the same being in the east half of said section 25 and the west half of said section 30, all in township 21. The state contends that the Arkansas river is a navigable stream, and that, under the'.common law and the various acts of Congress, the United States…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howard v. IngersollSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Houghton v. C., D. & M. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Dana v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Bennett v. National Starch Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
- Winters v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Sprynczynatyk v. MillsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.