Legal Opinion

Homcy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1976No. 187-74PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

In this military pay case plaintiff, a former U.S. Army lieutenant, seeks to recover accrued pay, allowances, and other benefits allegedly denied him from the time of his improper separation from the service in 1944. Because plaintiff’s claim is barred by the six-year statute of limitations and has not been revived by recent events, we hold for defendant.

*334The circumstances of the instant case are extraordinary, if for no other reason than the lapse of time between the underlying events and the initiation of the present suit. On August 27,1944, plaintiff refused an order from his battalion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Bonen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Eurell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. Nichols v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API