Legal Opinion

Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 14, 2012No. SUCV199806002HPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lauriat, Peter M., J.

In this fourteen-year-old class action, plaintiffs Lori Aspinall and Thomas Geanacopoulos, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (the “plaintiffs”), have now moved for partial summary judgment against defendants Philip Morris USA (“Philip Morris”) and Altria Group, Inc. (“Altria”) (collectively, the “defendants”). The plaintiffs urge the court to apply the doctrine of non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel to establish, as a matter of law, that the defendants are liable under G.L.c. 93A. For the following reasons, the plaintiffs’ motion is denied.

BACK…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tompkins v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API