Legal Opinion
Hildebrand v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 11, 2005No. 03-1018-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ Motion to Strike the Testimony and Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Expert William Treadwell Cronenwett (Dkt. No. 85). Defendants ask the court to strike the testimony and opinions of plaintiffs’ expert, William Treadwell Cronenwett, because he fails to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rules of Evidence 702 or the Daubert standards for admission of expert witness testimony. Plaintiffs respond that defendants mischaracterize Dr. Cronen-wett’s testimony and fail to consider circumstantial evidence. After…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GabaldonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Mehus v. Emporia State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pekarek v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008