Legal Opinion
Harrington v. Agricultural Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1930No. 27,748PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance wherein defendants, the insurers, appeal from an order sustaining general demurrers to their separate answers.
Taking as true the admitted allegations of the complaint and the averments of the answers, the facts are these: January 17, 1920, plaintiff leased a store property in Minneapolis for a term beginning March 15, 1920, and ending August 31, 1929. The terms of the lease were such that anything the lessee might add to the real estate by way of “improvements and betterments” would become the property of the lessor, the lessee’s interest therein being…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington Mills Emery Manufacturing Co. v. Weymouth & Braintree Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Itasca Paper Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hartford Insurance v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Getchell v. Mercantile & Manufacturer's Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
- Kludt v. German Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.