Legal Opinion

Kludt v. German Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

• Appeal from a judgment of th'e circuit court for Eond du Lac county: Chester A. Fowler, Circuit Judge. Tbis action was brought to recover upon an insurance policy. Tbe case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which is substantially as follows: That for several years prior to May 17, 1911, John Kludt, plaintiff’s intestate, was a resident of the town of Scott, She-boygan county, Wisconsin.

Read the full summary

• Appeal from a judgment of th'e circuit court for Eond du Lac county: Chester A. Fowler, Circuit Judge. Tbis action was brought to recover upon an insurance policy. Tbe case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts which is substantially as follows: That for several years prior to May 17, 1911, John Kludt, plaintiff’s intestate, was a resident of the town of Scott, She-boygan county, Wisconsin. That the defendant is a mutual fire insurance company belonging to the class known as “town mutual insurance companies,” and was duly organized as such and engaged in the business of fire insurance…

1Opinion of the CourtReewiN, J.

Tbe main question on this appeal is whether John Kludt, tbe plaintiff’s intestate, bad an insurable interest in tbe property covered by tbe policy in suit. A very able argument is made by counsel for appellant to tbe effect that be bad not, and many cases from other jurisdictions are cited in support of tbe contention. Tbe following authorities are cited by counsel for appellant and, in a measure at least, support their contention: German American Ins. Co. v. Paul, 2 Ind. Ter. 625, 53 S. W. 442; Bassett v. Farmers’ & M. Ins. Co. 85 Neb. 85, 122 N. W. 703; Clark v. Dwelling House Ins. Co. 81…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mutual Fire Insurance v. DealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  2. Joliffe v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Andes Insurance v. FishIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Dunbar v. Phenix Insurance Co. of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Agricultural Insurance v. MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Harrington v. Agricultural Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. SciandraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Rolater v. RolaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Beman v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API