In Re Catalano
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Petitioners (hereafter defendants), authorized representatives of the carpenters’ union, entered a construction site to inspect safety conditions and prepare a shop steward’s report. When they refused to leave upon request by an agent of the landowner, defendants were arrested and convicted of trespassing. (Pen. Code, § 602, subd. (k)(1).) 1 Maintaining that the record demonstrates that their conduct did not violate the trespass statute, defendants petition us for writs of habeas corpus. 2
We first observe that defendants, sentenced to a fine or imprisonment, are under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. ShabazzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.