Legal Opinion

In Re Catalano

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1981No. Docket Nos. Crim. 21445, 21446PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Petitioners (hereafter defendants), authorized representatives of the carpenters’ union, entered a construction site to inspect safety conditions and prepare a shop steward’s report. When they refused to leave upon request by an agent of the landowner, defendants were arrested and convicted of trespassing. (Pen. Code, § 602, subd. (k)(1).) 1 Maintaining that the record demonstrates that their conduct did not violate the trespass statute, defendants petition us for writs of habeas corpus. 2

We first observe that defendants, sentenced to a fine or imprisonment, are under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. VillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. ShabazzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API