Legal Opinion

Britt v. Garfoot

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are not disputed. The question raised upon this appeal is the construction of paragraph “Third (a)” of testator’s will which reads as follows :

“(a) One half of the residue of my estate, I give, devise and bequeath, share and share alike, to my three brothers, namely, Henry Britt and Louis Britt of Madison, Wisconsin, and John Britt of St. Paul,. Minnesota, being to each a one-third part thereof, to them and their heirs forever.”

Appellants are the sons and daughters of Henry Britt and are the legal heirs to whom all of the property disposed of by “Third (a)” would go in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Beuren v. . DashNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Cleaver v. CleaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Hoermann v. HoermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Farnsworth v. WhitingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  5. Will of JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GriffenWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Estate of Mangel v. StrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Estate of CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. In Matter of Estate of HillmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Wagner v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API