Will of Johnson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The most important controversy involves the construction of the fourteenth paragraph of the will, reading : “I leave the rest and residue of my estate to my exec*157utors to be divided equally among the heirs herein named in this will.” The county court construed the term “heirs’1’ to mean “legatees,” and distributed the residue of the estate equally between the legatees named in the v/ill who were living at the time of the death of the testatrix. This construction is challenged by the legal heirs of testatrix named in the will, who claim they are entitled to the residue of the estate.
The term…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Farnsworth v. WhitingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
- In re Cowley's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Patterson v. FullerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hoermann v. HoermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of Mangel v. StrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Schefe v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Jennings v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.