Legal Opinion

Centricut v. Esab Group

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided July 9, 2003No. CV-99-039-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Centricut v . Esab Group CV-99-039-M 07/09/03 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Centricut, LLC, Plaintiff v. Civil N o . 99-039-M Opinion N o .

2003 DNH 115

Esab Group, Inc., Defendant v. Centricut, LLC (New Hampshire) and Centricut, LLC (Delaware), Counterclaim Defendants O R D E R Centricut, LLC has preemptively sued Esab Group, Inc. (“Esab”), holder of United States patent 5,023,425 (“the ’425 patent”), seeking a declaratory judgment that: (1) it has not infringed the ’425 patent; (2) the ’425 patent is invalid on a variety of statutory grounds;1 and (3) the ’425 patent…

2Cases cited47 opinions

Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.