Legal Opinion

Cox v. Cartwright

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1953No. 4409PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Municipal Court of Akron, which sustained a demurrer to a cross-petition filed therein (and subsequent dismissal of the pleading, through a refusal to plead further) on the ground that the statute of limitations barred the action.

The cross-petitioner alleged that she consulted her adversary, a dentist, “about extracting two front teeth and making her a partial plate for the extracted front teeth * * #; that plaintiff agreed to do the work and supply the partial plate * * The pleading further stated in substance that,' after the teeth were ex-…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Hibbett v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Palm Beach Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Cook v. YagerOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Steinmetz v. Lowry, D.D.S. Assoc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API