Legal Opinion

Fringer v. Venema

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1965Published

1Opinion of the Court

26 Wis.2d 366 (1965)

FRINGER and another, Respondents,

v.

VENEMA, Appellant.[*]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 6, 1965.

February 2, 1965.

For the appellant there was a brief by Kenney, Korf & Pfeil of East Troy, and oral argument by Francis J. Korf.

For the respondents there was a brief by Morrissy, Morrissy, Sweet & Stowe of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Ralph R. Stowe.

BEILFUSS, J.

Plaintiffs base their cause of action upon sec. 172.01, Stats.:

"Animals not to run at large. No stallion over one year old, nor bull over six months old, nor boar, nor ram, nor billy goat over four months old shall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fringer v. VenemaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ritholz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. McCarty v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API