Legal Opinion

Hayden v. City of Port Townsend

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1980No. 46022PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

Appellants seek to invalidate (1) a rezone by the City of Port Townsend of 11.94 acres of undeveloped land, and (2) a building permit issued for a portion of the rezoned property to respondent Safeway Stores, Inc. The trial court upheld the action of the City. On appeal, the matter was certified here by the Court of Appeals. We affirm the trial court.

The land concerned is located in the City of Port Townsend several hundred feet southwest of a small body of water known as Kah Tai Lagoon. It is perhaps a little greater distance north of Port Townsend Bay. Sims Way, the principal highway…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Parkridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cathcart-Maltby-Clearview Community Council v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Pentagram Corp. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Davidson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API