Legal Opinion

Davidson v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1991No. 55965-1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Plaintiffs Clifford, Dorothy, and Edwin Davidson seek direct review of the trial court's decision rejecting their challenge to the location of the inner harbor line defining the waterward boundary of their shorelands. Plaintiffs assert the inner harbor line was improperly drawn in 1913 so as to deprive them of access to navigable water. Defendant State of Washington cross-appeals the trial court's declaration of a navigational easement across the State-owned harbor area in favor of plaintiffs. We hold for the State.

Plaintiffs own and operate a marina in the Kenmore area of Lake Washington.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Schuh v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hayden v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Harmony at Madrona Park Owners Ass'n v. Madison Harmony Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API