Legal Opinion

Pierce v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1963No. 36345, 36496PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

This is an appeal from judgments of the superior court in both certiorari and mandamus arising out of certain zoning resolutions in King County, Washington. The certiorari and mandamus proceedings were consolidated for the trial and this appeal.

Appellant, Eastgate Improvement Company, was part owner of and directly connected with the development of some two thousand acres of agricultural land east of Lake Washington in King County. When appellant and other corporations having common ownership acquired these extensive tracts in 1956, they had actually been zoned for agricultural purposes by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hull v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Miller v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cathcart-Maltby-Clearview Community Council v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API