Legal Opinion

Friedenwald Co. v. Sparger.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Actiow bv The Friedenw'ald Company 'against Sparger Bros, and others, heard by Judge B. W. TimberlaTce, at November Term, 1900, oí the Superior Court of Surry County. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

James IT. and B. F. Sparger, in November, 1897, being partners in trade, and finding themselves unable to pay their debts in full, made a voluntary assignment of all their property, real and personal, to T. B. McOargo and R. L. ITaymore, for the benefit of their creditors, with preferences. In the body of the deed it was recited that the grantors, as partners, under the film name of Sparger Bros, and James H. Sparger in his individual capiacity, in consideration of the premises, etc., conveyed the partnership property and also' the individual property, real and personal, of James H. Sparger —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown & Co. v. NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Guggenheimer v. . BrookfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Hawkins v. . AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
  4. Jordan v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Sutton v. BessentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Sutton v. . BessentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Sutton v. BessentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API