Sutton v. Bessent
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by R. M. Station and others against J. O. Bessent and others, heard by Judge Walter H. Neal, at March Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Forsyth County. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiffs appealed.
1Concurrence
WaxjoíR, T.,
concurring. I concur in the result reached by the Court, but I cannot assent to tbe statement, which, by tbe way, is not in my opinion necessary to tbe decision of tbe case, that tbe illustration of tbe presiding Judge in reference to tbe debt of Mr. Grogan was not a correct or proper one in law. While it is decided in Bank v. Gilmer, 116 N. C., 684, and other cases affiiming that decision, that a failure to *564file a schedule of the preferred debts will vitiate the assignment under the Act of 1893, ch. 453, in the more recent cases of Brown v. Nimocks, 124 N. C., 417, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Bank of Greensboro v. GilmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Morris v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Brown & Co. v. NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Friedenwald Co. v. Sparger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Doe on Demise of Brannock v. BrannockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.