Guggenheimer v. . Brookfield
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Motiox to vacate an attachment, in an action pending in Meckeenbubo Superior Court, heard at Charlotte on March 16th, 1883, before MaoRae, J. From the judgment vacating the attachment the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The plaintiffs commenced their action on March 2d, 1883, and at the same time sued out a warrant of attachment which was at once levied upon goods of the defendant. The order for its issue was based upon an affidavit stating that the defendant “has assigned and disposed of some of his property with intent to defraud his creditors, as affiant is informed and believes.”
After giving notice to the plaintiff of the intended application, the defendants’ counsel on March 16th moved before MaoRae, J., to vacate the order and discharge the attachment, which being heard upon affidavits, ivas allowed,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rencher v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Moore v. . HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Hale v. . RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barber v. . BuffaloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Estridge v. DensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Friedenwald Co. v. Sparger.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Wooldridge v. IrvingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884