Commonwealth v. Devan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress certain oral statements and physical evidence because they were obtained in violation of Pa.R. Crim.P. 130 and Commonwealth v. Davenport, 471 Pa. 278, 370 A.2d 301 (1977). Because we agree that the oral statements should have been suppressed, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
On October 28, 1981, at approximately 3:30 p.m., appellant was arrested while walking along York Road in Abing-ton Township after police received information from security personnel at the Lord and Taylor’s department store…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Overly v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. RevtaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PerezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. SchimelfenigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.