Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Slay

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1953No. 38664PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Appellants, Minnie Nelson and two dependent step-grandchildren of deceased, Andrew Nelson, filed their claims for workmen’s compensation before the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Commission for the death of Andrew Nelson, husband and step-grandfather of appellants. Appellees, J. W. Slay and his compensation insurance carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, contested the claims. Appellants are dependents of deceased and his death arose out of and in the course of his work. The only question is whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the attorney-referee that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sones v. Southern Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Carr v. CRABTREEMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Taylor v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Hatch v. Industrial Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Williams v. GeorgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Bardwell v. Perry Timber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brown v. LA Penn & SonMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cooks v. Neely Lumber CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mullins & Parker v. RuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Durham v. Deemer Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API