Legal Opinion

Dbhl, Inc. v. Moen Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 25, 2009No. 01-08-00046-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE BLAND, Justice.

After DBHL, Inc. and Dearborn HL, S. de R.L. de C.V. (DBHL) settled numerous product liability claims for damages resulting from a defective plumbing part, it sued Moen Incorporated and Moen Sonora S.A. de C.V. (Moen) for indemnification based on a Texas statute and a provision of an asset purchase agreement (APA) under which DBHL acquired a prototype of a defective part. Moen counterclaimed for indemnity for attorney’s fees that it expended in connection with the underlying claims. The trial court granted summary judgment against DBHL on its statutory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borusan Mannesmann Pipe US, Inc. v. Hunting Energy Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2023
  2. Gilbert Kouba, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Audrey Kouba, Karen Williams and Curtis Kouba v. Northland Industries, Inc. D/B/A Magnum Fitness , JHTNA Manufacturing, L.L.C., and Johsnon Health Tech North America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  3. Peter Hardsteen and Paulina Mayberg Hardsteen and Intervenor Texas Farm Bureau v. Dean's Campin Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API