Legal Opinion

in the Interest of M.Y.G., C.R.J., N.R., Children

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 31, 2014No. 07-13-00298-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice.

In this accelerated appeal, Amber and Carl 1 appeal an order terminating their respective parental rights to the children. Amber appeals as to all of the listed children and Carl appeals as to M.Y.G. and C.R. J. The father of N.R. has not appealed the trial court’s ruling.

Amber and Carl each contest the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s judgment terminating their respective parental rights for knowingly placing or knowingly allowing the children to remain in conditions or surroundings that endangered their physical or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.E.H., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2026
  2. M. R., C. B. and J. R. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
  3. in the Interest of B.E.T., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  4. in the Interest of L.D.A. and D.D.A., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
  5. in the Interest of M.D. and B.D., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API