Sidden v. Mailman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals a supplemental order affirming a separation and property settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendant based on plaintiffs failure to present facts supporting her entitlement to relief under the theory of breach of fiduciary duty. We affirm.
A full statement of the facts is set forth in this Court’s earlier opinion of Sidden v. Mailman, 137 N.C. App. 669, 629 S.E.2d 266 (2000) (“Sidden /”). Therefore, we summarize the facts to present only those facts needed for an understanding of this opinion: Plaintiff and defendant were married on 21 April 1979. On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harton v. HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Clement v. ClementSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Galloway v. LinnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dawbarn v. DawbarnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Harris v. Testar, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- In Re Estate of SmidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Estate of SmidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Poulos v. PoulosNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.