Legal Opinion

Dawbarn v. Dawbarn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 2006No. COA05-364PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In general, public policy “is not offended by permitting . . . spouses to execute a complete settlement of all spousal interests in each other’s real and personal property and yet live together.” In re Estate of Tucci, 94 N.C. App. 428, 438, 380 S.E.2d 782, 788 (1989). In this case, Plaintiff-husband argues that the postnuptial agreement provided an economic incentive to his Defendant-wife to leave the marriage and therefore was repugnant to public policy. The post-nuptial agreement in this case transferred the property to the wife upon the signing of the agreement, whether the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Harton v. HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Biesecker v. BieseckerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Baars v. Campbell University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crogan v. CroganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brewer v. IMG College, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  5. In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation MDL No. 2036 Doris Powell-Perry v. Branch Banking And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API