Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1842PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Qlarh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackfoed, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Brovin against Salmon. There are three counts in the declaration. The first is as follows: “Samuel M. Brown complains of John Salmon in a plea of trespass-on the case; for that, whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the eighth day of September, 1830, at Louisville, viz., at the county of Clark aforesaid, the said Salmon, in consideration that one R. Be Hart, at the special instance and request of the said Salmon, had made, executed and delivered to him, the said Salmon, a bill of sale, dated the first of September, 1830, of his half interest in the steam…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Bird v. LaniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Rutledge's Adm'r v. Townsend, Crane & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  4. Hendricks v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Reddick v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API