Legal Opinion
Pantazis v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 10, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.), entered April 21, 1993, which denied, without prejudice to renewal, defendant New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint against the New York City Transit Authority dismissed.
The Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment since the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). The Transit Authority cannot be held…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Balsam v. Delma Engineering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Balsam v. Delma Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tortora v. Pearl Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mahase v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Arpi v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Towbin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Simo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Shaller v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.