Tortora v. Pearl Foods, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered December 30, 1992, which denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously re*472versed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed, without costs.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment since the plaintiff failed to establish the existence of any triable issue of fact (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). There is nothing in the record to suggest that the defendant made any repairs to the public sidewalk where the plaintiff purportedly fell…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Balsam v. Delma Engineering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Balsam v. Delma Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Roark v. HuntingNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wilma Williams v. Kfc National Management CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Bailey v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Frank v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ruffino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Otero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.