Legal Opinion
Simo v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*610In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals and the defendant NAB Construction Corp./Grow Tunneling Corp., J.V, cross-appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J), entered May 2, 2002, as, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability finding the New York City Transit Authority 40% at fault in the happening of the accident and NAB Construction Corp./Grow Tunneling Corp., J.V, 60% at fault in the happening of the accident, upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages awarding the plaintiff the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Schneider v. Kings Highway Hospital Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hambsch v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cassano v. HagstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Pantazis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arpi v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Kleinberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Khemraj v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Fernandez v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Gasis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.