Legal Opinion

State v. Holcomb

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2009No. 24287PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In 2000, as part of a plea agreement, Daniel Holcomb pleaded guilty to three felonies, and the trial court sentenced him to 13 years in prison. In 2008, Holcomb moved the trial court to “correct sentencing,” arguing that it had failed to include mandatory postrelease control as part of his sentence, thereby rendering the sentence void. The trial court held that Holcomb’s motion was, in substance, an untimely and successive petition for postconviction relief and, accordingly, dismissed it. This court reverses.

{¶ 2} Since his guilty plea, Holcomb has filed a number of motions with this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. MeinckeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. CedenoOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API