Legal Opinion
Reliance Insurance v. Doctors Co.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 29, 2004No. 1:02-cr-00159PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED ON 11/25/02, AND RECOGNIZING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FILED ON 2/6/03 AS MOOT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED ON 1/8/03, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 56(f) RAISED IN ITS MEMORANDUM OF OPPOSITION OF 2/4/03 TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GILLMOR, District Judge.
The instant case involves a dispute between an excess insurer and a primary insurer over a $4.3 million medical malpractice settlement.
Plaintiff Reliance Insurance Company…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
- Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
- Heffelfinger v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Sonnenberg v. Disability Rights Idaho, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.