Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Kinnan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 2006No. 32922-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Bridgewater, J.

— Stacey L. Kinnan appeals from a modification of a parenting plan that removed a restriction requiring Linnette M. Jordan, the mother, to supervise the two minor children of the parties and at no time to allow Jeff Jordan to be alone with the children should she leave the residence. The dissolution trial court, also the modification trial court, had imposed the restriction because Mr. Jordan, then Mrs. Jordan’s boyfriend, had pleaded guilty to communication with a minor for immoral purposes. We reverse, vacate the modification order, and remand for an appropriate hearing.

I.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. FagaldeWashington Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of FaheyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. In Re the Marriage of WehrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. In Re The Marriage Of: Mckayla Smith, V Matthew SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. In the Matter of the Marriage of: Kevin O'Connell & Amy O'ConnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Kevin Suver v. Rebecca MalloyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API