Legal Opinion
Weissburg v. Lancaster School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2010No. 08-55660PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Joseph and Adria Weissburg (“Weiss-burgs”) brought an action for attorneys’ fees against Lancaster School District (“school district”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(3)(B), on behalf of their child, Edward Weissburg (“Edward”). Edward is a seven-year-old child with developmental disabilities who is eligible for special education under the IDEA. In 2005, the district issued an assessment that classified Edward as mentally retarded, but concluded that he did not display autistic behavior. During the 2005-2006 and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Parents of Student W, Individually and as Guardians Student W, a Minor v. Puyallup School District, No. 3Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Timothy O. v. Paso Robles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Meridian Joint School District No. 2 v. D.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- R.C. ex rel. S.K. v. Keller Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- RICKLEY v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- L.H. v. Chino Valley Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.