Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Gent

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 7, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Russell county in an action of ejectment. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants assign error.

1Opinion of the Court

"Whittle, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error, Gent, filed his declaration in *785ejectment in the circuit court against the plaintiffs in error, W. H. Sutherland, Johnson Sutherland, Morgan Sutherland and George Ramey, to recover 267% acres of land situated in Russell county. The case was tried at January term, 1913, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Numerous exceptions were taken by the defendants to rulings of the court on evidence and instructions, and finally to the refusal to set aside the verdict as contrary to the law and the evidence.

The.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Holleran v. MeiselSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Douglas Land Co. v. T. W. Thayer Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Staak v. SigelkowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robertson's v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Griggs v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Edwards v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Radford Veneer Corp. v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. Ragsdale v. BothmanMontana Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API