Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Bothman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1928No. 6,226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an action upon certain promissory notes executed and delivered by Laura A. Bothman and John Bothman to Ragsdale & Company, indorsed to the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s complaint is substantially the ordinary one in such case. In his answer, defendant John Bothman admitted the execution of the notes and nonpayment but pleaded that he had been absolved from payment by reason of his discharge in bankruptcy. Plaintiff replied alleging that the obligations sued upon were expressly excepted from the operation of the discharge for the reason that they were not scheduled as liabilities by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Birkett v. Columbia BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Denburgh v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ward v. MeyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Gamble v. Cornell Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API