Legal Opinion

Wanner v. Mears

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Oceana. (Dickerman, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. . The facts-are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

August 10, 1891, plaintiff and wife gave to-defendant a chattel mortgage on their wrecking scow and outfit for $500, to secure the payment of their note of like amount, due on or before one year from date. The parties at that time all lived in Chicago, 111., and the mortgage was given and filed there. The mortgage contained a clause giving the mortgagors the right of possession until default made in payment, and also the following stipulation:

“Or if the mortgagee, his executors, administrators, or assigns, shall feel he is insecure or unsafe, or shall fear diminution, removal, or waste of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. OXFORD CONSUMER DIS. CO. v. StefanelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. State v. SteeleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Tanga v. TangaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Eberts v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. MacGregorMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API