Legal Opinion

Abeln v. City of Shakopee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1947No. Nos. 34,484, 34,485, 34,486, 34,487PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chibe Justice.

These two cases involve the revocation of 19 licenses to sell nonintoxicating malt liquor at retail, held severally by the various plaintiffs.' For convenience, such licenses will be hereinafter referred to ás “beer licenses.” M. S. A. § 340.025 (L. 1939, c. 138, § 1), requires the revocation without notice and without a hearing of any such license of—

“any person who is also the owner and holder of, or to whom there is hereafter issued, a federal retail liquor dealer’s special tax stamp for the sale of intoxicating liquor at any place unless there has also been issued to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bartemeyer v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Paron v. City of ShakopeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Lincoln Federal Labor Union No. 19129 v. Northwestern Iron & Metal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Country Liquors, Inc. v. City Council of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API