Legal Opinion

Enneberg v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Columbia: James A. Eakin, Judge. In Banc.

1Opinion of the CourtBenson, J.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss tbe appeal upon three grounds:(a) That an order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss an appeal in the Circuit Court is not an appeal-able order.(b) That an appeal cannot be prosecuted unless appellant files in this court a complete transcript of the evidence taken in the trial court.(c) That defendant has not filed an undertaking on appeal.

1. Considering these in their order, we observe that the notice of appeal reads as follows:

“Please take'notice that the defendant above named hereby appeals from the whole of the certain judgment made and rendered in this action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rohde v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Knowles v. Whitehead Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Degidio v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Jackson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API