Legal Opinion

Miller v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Multnomah: Robert G-. Morrow, Judge. Proceedings by George Miller for workman’s compensation before the State Industrial Accident Commission. From a judgment reversing the order of the commission, the commission appealed. On motion to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

1. This is an appeal by the defendant from a decision of the Circuit Court of Multnomah County, Oregon, reversing an order of the commission as to the validity of the plaintiff’s claim for compensation for an injury sustained while he was employed as a carpenter working on a building in the City of Portland. The plaintiff’s counsel move to dismiss the appeal because no undertaking has been filed. Section 578, L. O. L., reads:

“In all actions or proceedings in any court in this state in which the State of Oregon is a party, or interested therein, it shall not be required to advance any…

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Harvey v. George J. Roche & SonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Enneberg v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Goss v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API