Legal Opinion

Hough v. Bureau of Prisons

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 6, 2024No. 5:24-cv-03077Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MALIK HOUGH, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 24-3077-JWL FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff Malik Hough is hereby required to show good cause, in writing to the undersigned, why this action should not be dismissed due to the deficiencies in Plaintiff’s Complaint that are discussed herein. I. Nature of the Matter before the Court Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, brings this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff is incarcerated at USP-Leavenworth in Leavenworth,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API