Legal Opinion

Peters v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1985No. Docket Nos. 71928, 71931. (Calendar Nos. 13, 14)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

The Court granted leave in these two cases in order to consider the legal standard to be applied in workers’ compensation cases involving psychiatric disabilities related to employment. The Legislature has amended the relevant statute effective January 1, 1982. Because this Court today *598in Hurd v Ford Motor Co, 423 Mich 531; 377 NW2d 300 (1985), has construed this statute as applicable to "personal injuries occurring on or after January 1, 1982,” we decline to reexamine our interpretation of the earlier statute in Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc (After Remand), 403 Mich 1; 268 NW2d 1 (1978).

Fa…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gardner v. Van Buren Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Iloyan v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. McVey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Corbett v. Plymouth TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API