Legal Opinion

Klarr v. Heckart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury. Plaintiff sued to recover a commission resulting from the sale of a merchandise inventory and equipment, based on the reasonable value of services rendered, alleged in the second amended complaint to be $8,800. Appropriate allegations appear negativing the application of ORS 696.610 et seq (Business Chance Broker Act). The jury returned its verdict in the sum of $5,000. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. Klarr v. Heckart, 206 Or 178, 291 P2d 1016. In our opinion therein we held the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Inwall v. Transpacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Clarke-Woodward Drug Co. v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Dillon v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Klarr v. HeckartOregon Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. FlescherOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API