Legal Opinion

Turner v. Stime

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 17, 2009No. 27037-8-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl Darlene and Bill Turner sued Dr. Nathan Stime and Riverside Medical Clinic (collectively Dr. Stime) for medical malpractice. The jury returned a verdict for Dr. Stime. Two jurors then stated that during deliberations several jurors had referred to the Turners’ attorney, who is of Japanese ancestry, as “Mr. Kamikaze,” “Mr. Miyashi,” “Mr. Miyagi,” or “Mr. Havacoma.” One juror also reportedly stated that the defense verdict was “almost appropriate” given that it was delivered on December 7, a reference to the day in 1941 when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor.

Kulik, A.C.J.

*585¶2 The trial court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. StubbsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BerheWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Plese-Graham, LLC v. LoshbaughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API