Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Lindner
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 9, 2002No. 01-2068PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Myron Goldstein and the Park Family Limited Partnership (Goldstein) appeal a summary judgment dismissing their complaint seeking declaratory relief with respect to their interest in mineral rights. Because we agree with the circuit court that there are no genuine issues of material fact, we affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. This case involves a forty-acre parcel of land in the Town of Nashville. On February 1, 1975, Ernest and Antonette Ehrenberg, owners of the parcel, signed a twenty-five-year mining lease with Exxon Corporation. The mining lease granted Exxon the right to conduct…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Huml v. VlaznyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Riegleman v. KriegCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Alaskan Crude Corp. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Marks v. Houston Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- ALASKAN CRUDE CORP. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.